![]() |
| The Laughing Buddha |
![]() |
| Courtesy of 67notout.com |
Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen.
Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.
The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!"
"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"
When it comes to badminton, we all mostly observe the rules to play but we all play according to a further rule set in our heads. When we play there is a constant dialogue in our heads that tells us which shots we should play and where we should move on the court. It is our tactical rule set. Given that we don't win all our matches it seems safe to conclude that our tactical rule set is flawed or limited. We don't know how to play badminton, we only know how we believe we should play badminton. We know our rituals for playing, and that is what they are. Some rituals are more effective than others.
The claim that players are not top players is nothing more than a cop out. It is as much to say that a player has no interest in improving their game through education. Badminton players are similar to professionals in other walks of life. Professionals seek out efficient methods of operation in order to compete. They seek out methods to achieve the same or better results. It is a cornerstone of progress. When put back in context of the badminton player it explains why top players have so much time to hit the shuttle with respect to the recreational player. While certain techniques are beyond the reach of recreational players, many are simply stepping stones along a path.
This explains in part, why the more tactically astute player can gain advantage over a fitter player.
Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.
The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!"
"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"
When it comes to badminton, we all mostly observe the rules to play but we all play according to a further rule set in our heads. When we play there is a constant dialogue in our heads that tells us which shots we should play and where we should move on the court. It is our tactical rule set. Given that we don't win all our matches it seems safe to conclude that our tactical rule set is flawed or limited. We don't know how to play badminton, we only know how we believe we should play badminton. We know our rituals for playing, and that is what they are. Some rituals are more effective than others.
The claim that players are not top players is nothing more than a cop out. It is as much to say that a player has no interest in improving their game through education. Badminton players are similar to professionals in other walks of life. Professionals seek out efficient methods of operation in order to compete. They seek out methods to achieve the same or better results. It is a cornerstone of progress. When put back in context of the badminton player it explains why top players have so much time to hit the shuttle with respect to the recreational player. While certain techniques are beyond the reach of recreational players, many are simply stepping stones along a path.
This explains in part, why the more tactically astute player can gain advantage over a fitter player.


No comments:
Post a Comment